Karen DeYoung writes that lawmakers have expressed worry the uncertainty could hurt already cloudy bilateral relations between the Obama administration and Afghan President Hamid Karzaiâs camp.
âThe lack of clarity on this point has led to too much hedging in the region,â Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) told administration officials at a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing Thursday.
âAfghans who may otherwise be interested in building a fledgling democracy want to know that they will not be abandoned by the United States as the Taliban claims they will be,â the committee chairman added.
Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) told the committee the âcontinued navel-gazingâ is affecting not only U.S. efforts in Afghanistan but also the military and the nationâs allies.
Both lawmakers indicated they would rather see President Barack Obama safeguard the integrity of Afghanistanâs presidential elections in October than focus on pursuing peace talks with the Taliban.
Announcing a provisional follow-on force structure, ahead of wrapping up a protracted bilateral security agreement, would give Afghans reassurance of continued American commitment ahead of the polls, they added.
âIn our statements, (we) have to make clear that this election is the top priority,â Stephen V. Hadley, former national security adviser to President George W. Bush, said in his testimony.
âI think a lot of Afghans thought that reconciliation with the Taliban was our top priority. This should be our top priority. It is our top priority. We have not made that clear,â Hadley added.
James Dobbins, White House special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, told the committee that the president was âstill reviewing his optionsâ on the military presence.