Home / News / Army Conducts Ground-Based Manned-Unmanned Teaming Demo

Army Conducts Ground-Based Manned-Unmanned Teaming Demo

The U.S. Army paired manned platforms with robotic systems on the ground as part of the manned-unmanned teaming demonstration held Tuesday at Fort Benning in Georgia, Defense News reported Friday.

The service branch’s Maneuver Center of Excellence combined a semiautonomous MRZR combat vehicle with an unmanned Hoverfly quadcopter to carry out reconnaissance operations as part of the exercise’s first scenario.

The Army also used a robotic wingman with a long range advance scout surveillance system – LRAS3 – to lead a group of crewed Humvees to detect positions of adversaries as well as a manned M113 armored personnel carrier to field a ground-based robot – Packbot – to conduct surveillance operations.

The robotic wingman fired at enemy targets after it received information from the manned Humvee.

The military branch also used the MRZR to perform reconnaissance, an Abrams tank section and a semiautonomous M58 vehicle with a smoke generator called Wolf as part of the Abrams Lethality Enabler demonstration.

The M58 Wolf vehicle works to conceal and allow the tank to move into its position by fielding heavy smoke.

The Army carried out the two-part demonstration in compliance with the Robotics and Autonomous Systems Strategy and Combat Vehicle Modernization Strategy.

Robert Sadowski, robotics chief with the Army’s tank automotive research, development and engineering center, said the service expects to transition the land-based robotic programs to the National Training Center within two to five years.

Check Also

Vice Adm. Matthew Kohler on Navy’s Current Information Warfare Approach

Vice Adm. Matthew Kohler, the top information warfare officer at the U.S. Navy, told C4ISRNET in an interview published Monday that the service considers information warfare as decisive both in daily operations and high-end kinetic fight. “In information warfare, while the rest of the warfare areas are involved in the high-end conflict [eventually], we consider the high-end conflict now. Constant contact with the enemy in terms of cybersecurity, being able to operate within the [electromagnetic spectrum], all of those. We consider ourselves in contact with the adversary now,” Kohler said. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *