Processing....

Logo

Digital News Coverage of Government Contracting and Federal Policy Landscape
Sticky Logo
  • Home
  • Acquisition & Procurement
  • Agencies
    • DoD
    • Intelligence
    • DHS
    • Civilian
    • Space
  • Cybersecurity
  • Technology
  • Executives
    • Profiles
    • Announcements
    • Awards
  • News
  • Articles
  • About
  • Wash100
  • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Submit your news
    • Jobs
Logo
Articles
FAR Compliance: What You Need to Know Before Delivering Goods to the Government
by Kaye Howard
Published on June 6, 2024
FAR Compliance: What You Need to Know Before Delivering Goods to the Government

FAR compliance is crucial for government contractors to maintain their ties with the federal government. Complying with these regulations allows companies to establish their trades, deliver goods and services and maintain honest and transparent transactions. 

If you’re looking to provide services and solutions to the government, read on to learn more about FAR compliance.

 

Table of Contents

  • What is FAR?
  • FAR Compliance Components: Where to Start?
    • FAR Part 31 – Contract Cost Principles and Procedures
    • FAR Part 52 – Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses
    • FAR Part 15 – Contracting by Negotiation
    • FAR Part 17 – Special Contracting Methods
    • FAR Part 19 – Small Business Programs
    • FAR Part 36 – Construction and Architect-Engineer Contracts
    • Other Components to Consider
  • Frequently Asked Questions
    • What Are the Different Types of FAR Contracts?
    • Does FAR Apply to All Government Agencies?
    • What is DFARS?

What is FAR?

Book with Federal Acquisition Regulation title
Photo by Yuriy K/ Shutterstock

The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) is the primary set of regulations encompassing all government procurement aspects of executive agencies. It was formed through the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act of 1974, which created a standard for acquiring goods and services for federal agencies in the executive branch.

FAR ensures the delivery of top-caliber products and services while maintaining public trust and fulfilling public policy objectives.

As stated in section 1.102, the main goals of FAR are to:

(1) Satisfy the customer in terms of cost, quality and timeliness of the delivered product or service by, for example –

(i) Maximizing the use of commercial products and commercial services

(ii) Contracting with companies who have a track record of successful past performance or who have demonstrated the ability to perform

(iii) Promoting competition

(2) Minimize administrative operating costs

(3) Conduct business with integrity, fairness and openness

(4) Fulfill public policy objectives

Simply put, FAR compliance is a manual that government contractors must follow to deliver goods and services to federal agencies. It outlines what contractors can and can not charge in a federal contract. 

 

FAR Compliance Components: Where to Start?

Government contractors having a meeting
Photo by Ground Picture/ Shutterstock

Reading and understanding all eight subchapters and 53 parts of the FAR can be daunting, but there’s a handful of components that fledgling contractors can begin with. 

Outlined below are the key parts to help you get started in FAR compliance:

 

FAR Part 31 – Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

FAR Part 31 defines the procedures and principles involving contracting costs, such as establishing reasonableness, determining allocability and accounting for unallowable costs.

 

FAR Part 52 – Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses

FAR Part 52 covers the clauses and provisions on allowable costs and payments, including:

  • Reimbursement
  • Direct labor
  • Invoicing
  • Travel expenses
  • Bill payments
  • Warranties
  • Termination
  • Supplies and services
  • Indirect expenses

 

FAR Part 15 – Contracting by Negotiation

FAR Part 15 establishes the policies and processes for contract negotiations. It guides agencies in preparing proposals and contracts.

At the same time, it gives contractors an estimate of how long a contract negotiation takes to determine the final costs and pricing. It can help contractors gauge their submissions to agencies accordingly.

 

FAR Part 17 – Special Contracting Methods

FAR Part 17 encompasses specialized contracting arrangements, such as options, leader company and multi-year contracting. Multi-year contracts aim to lower costs, ensure production continuity, stabilize contractor workforces and reduce the administrative burden of contracts.

Moreover, FAR Part 17 clarifies the multi-year agreement requirements for the DoD, NASA and the Coast Guard, including:

  • Substantial cost savings
  • Unchanged procurement needs
  • Stable supply designs
  • Reasonable funding expectations
  • Realistic cost estimates

 

FAR Part 19 – Small Business Programs

FAR Part 19 covers many elements related to small businesses, including participation through HUBZone, service-disabled veteran-owned, women-owned small businesses (WOSB) and economically disadvantaged women-owned small businesses (EDWOSB).

Additionally, section 19.202-1 promotes the involvement of small businesses in acquisitions and ensures equal opportunity to compete for federal contracts. 

 

FAR Part 36 – Construction and Architect-Engineer Contracts

FAR Part 36 delves into the contracting procedures and policies for construction and architect-engineer services. It sheds light on standard form requirements and clauses for demolition, dismantling or removal of improvements.

 

Other Components to Consider

Besides the six essential FAR components, contractors also need to consider provisions for labor standards, intellectual property rights and other clauses.

Here are other FAR clauses to consider:

 

Termination for Convenience

This clause allows the government to end a contract at any time for any reason. While it gives the government flexibility in its procurement process, it poses a risk for contractors if they’ve already invested time and resources into fulfilling the contract’s orders.

 

Changes

Under this provision, the government is allowed to change the contract’s terms and conditions. That said, contractors must be prepared to adapt to these adjustments, whether small or drastic, to fulfill their end of the agreement.

 

Disputes

This clause defines the protocols for resolving disagreements between the government and contractor. It’s designed to promote fairness and transparency in the contracting process.

 

Small Business Subcontracting

Under this clause, large contractors are required to include smaller businesses in their subcontracting plan. It promotes small business participation in the government contracting process.

 

The Davis-Bacon Act

The Davis-Bacon and Related Acts oversee prevailing wages, regulations and standards that federal agencies must observe. This provision protects workers from being underpaid and prevents contractors from gaining an unfair advantage.

 

Frequently Asked Questions

 

What Are the Different Types of FAR Contracts?

The six types of contracts governed by the Federal Acquisition Regulation are:

  • Fixed-price
  • Cost-reimbursement
  • Incentive
  • Indefinite-delivery (requirements, definite-quantity and indefinite-quantity)
  • Agreements (basic and basic ordering)
  • Time-and-materials, labor-hour and letter

 

Does FAR Apply to All Government Agencies?

No, it doesn’t. FAR only applies to contracts awarded by agencies within the executive branch, such as the DOD, DOJ and VA.

Contracts from the legislative and judicial branches are subject to separate regulations.

 

What is DFARS?

FAR and DFARS may look and sound familiar, but they differ greatly in how they’re used. 

Any contracting entity working on a federal contract is subject to FAR compliance. Meanwhile,  only entities working with Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) must comply with the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement.

Additionally, DFARS is a supplement to FAR; contractors must still comply with FAR when working on contracts from the DoD.

 

You might also want to read: Beginner’s Guide to Becoming a Government Contractor

DoD/News
Denise Oberndorf, Others on Army-Wide Capabilities Protection Initiative’s Role in Protecting Financial Data
by Naomi Cooper
Published on June 5, 2024
Denise Oberndorf, Others on Army-Wide Capabilities Protection Initiative’s Role in Protecting Financial Data

The Army-Wide Capabilities Protection initiative and Sensitive Activities Working Group play key roles in protecting the service branch’s critical financial data from threats posed by adversaries seeking to leverage U.S. military resources.

“Together, the AWCP initiative and SAWG’s efforts will better protect our data and prevent our adversaries from gaining leverage against the Army’s warfighting capabilities” according to an article co-written by cBEYONData’s Denise Oberndorf and Kelsey Buchanan and Tim Kuhl, chief of the Sensitive Activities Secure Financials division within the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Financial Management & Comptroller).

The AWCP initiative is a multi-disciplinary team dedicated to facilitating collaboration across the Army to support operations and innovations while keeping data secure. The team aims to provide data protection while advancing the Army’s analytical and technological capabilities.

The Army’s financial domain is among the top priorities of the AWCP initiative, which aims to identify and mitigate data vulnerabilities that could leak information about Army capabilities.

POC - 2024 Army Summit

Join the Potomac Officers Club’s 9th Annual Army Summit on June 13. Register here to reserve your seat and hear from Army officials about their most urgent priorities for 2024 and beyond.

DoD/News
Air Force Global Strike Command Conducts Minuteman III ICBM Test
by Jerry Petersen
Published on June 5, 2024
Air Force Global Strike Command Conducts Minuteman III ICBM Test

A test launch involving an unarmed Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile, or ICBM, equipped with a reentry vehicle was conducted on June 4.

The ICBM took off from Vandenberg Space Force Base in California and its reentry vehicle flew to the Ronald Reagan Ballistic Missile Defense Test Site on the U.S. Army Garrison-Kwajalein Atoll in the Republic of the Marshall Islands, over 4,000 miles away, according to an article posted Tuesday on the U.S. Air Force website.

The test was carried out by airmen from Air Force Global Strike Command with support from U.S. Space Force guardians. AFGSC commander Gen. Thomas Bussiere said the test sought to demonstrate the safety, effectiveness and readiness of the strategic deterrence capability of the U.S.

Various sensors were used to monitor the performance of the ICBM during the test.

The Air Force seeks to ensure the viability of the Minuteman ICBM until its successor, the LG-35A Sentinel, achieves full capability in the mid-2030s.

Air Force Global Strike Command Conducts Minuteman III ICBM Test

The Potomac Officers Club’s 2024 Air Force Summit will bring together top DAF leaders and decision makers, alongside industry experts, to discuss the future of the service. Register now to attend this important event!

News
NSUF Awards 33 Rapid Turnaround Experiments on Nuclear Energy
by Naomi Cooper
Published on June 5, 2024
NSUF Awards 33 Rapid Turnaround Experiments on Nuclear Energy

The Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy’s Nuclear Science User Facilities Program, or NSUF, has selected 33 Rapid Turnaround Experiment projects to support efforts to advance nuclear science and technology.

The awardees, which include principal investigators from 13 universities, six national laboratories and industry, will have access to NSUF testing resources over the next nine months to conduct a diverse range of nuclear energy and materials research.

They will examine the potential use of materials, fuels and sensors in maintaining the existing U.S. fleet of reactors and advance next-generation nuclear technologies.

In a separate announcement, NSUF said the projects were worth a combined value of $1.9 million, bringing the total RTE awards to roughly $3.37 million for fiscal year 2024.

The application for the third and final RTE call for fiscal year 2024 opened on Monday.

Contract Awards/News
BlackSky Secures NRO Contract Extension for High-frequency Imagery Services
by Christine Thropp
Published on June 5, 2024
BlackSky Secures NRO Contract Extension for High-frequency Imagery Services

BlackSky Technology will continue providing the National Reconnaissance Office with advanced high frequency imagery services under a one-year extension on the Electro-Optical Commercial Layer, or EOCL, subscription contract.

The company said Wednesday it rapidly delivers Gen-2 imagery and analytics up to 15 times per day to senior military leaders, warfighters and other U.S. government users through its constellation design and use of end-to-end artificial intelligence-driven system automation.

According to BlackSky CEO Brian O’Toole, the EOCL contract is now in its third year and underscores the value of the real-time, high-revisit monitoring approach of the company.

“This contract represents continued confidence in BlackSky as a trusted mission partner as the NRO makes strides in leveraging commercial space technology to strengthen national security,” said O’Toole.

In May 2022, BlackSky secured the EOCL contract, which has a five-year base and five one-year options for additional services. The company employs an advanced software-as-a-service customer platform and its 14-satellite constellation to offer one of the highest dawn-to-dusk revisit rates, averaging a collection time of less than 90 minutes from when a customer places an order to product delivery.

DoD/Government Technology/News
DOD Directs Components to Use Spiral 4 Contract Vehicle for Wireless Mobility Services Procurement
by Jane Edwards
Published on June 5, 2024
DOD Directs Components to Use Spiral 4 Contract Vehicle for Wireless Mobility Services Procurement

The Department of Defense has released a memorandum directing all DOD components to use the Spiral 4 contract vehicle when procuring unclassified wireless mobile devices and services as part of efforts to streamline the acquisition process and enable visibility of wireless usage, monthly spending and inventory.

The May 23 memo also applies to military personnel and federal civilian employees stationed within the country and U.S. territories who travel internationally.

Spiral 4 is a 10-year, $2.67 billion follow-on indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract for wireless mobility services and devices the U.S. Navy awarded in early May.

Seven companies secured spots on the recompete contract, which replaces the Spiral 3 vehicle that expired on May 7.

According to the document, all DOD organizations should transition their mobile device acquisitions to Spiral 4 “no later than at the end of their current order’s period of performance.

John Sherman, chief information officer of DOD and a 2024 Wash100 awardee, signed the memo.

Cybersecurity/News
ONCD Develops Pilot Reciprocity Framework for Harmonizing Cybersecurity Regulations
by Naomi Cooper
Published on June 5, 2024
ONCD Develops Pilot Reciprocity Framework for Harmonizing Cybersecurity Regulations

National Cyber Director Harry Coker said the White House Office of the National Cyber Director is launching a pilot reciprocity framework for use in a critical infrastructure subsector to gain insights on how to harmonize cybersecurity regulations.

The effort builds on the findings of ONCD’s August 2023 request for information, which sought industry feedback on existing challenges with regulatory overlap and explored a framework for harmonization and reciprocity of baseline cybersecurity requirements, Coker said in a blog post published Tuesday.

ONCD has been collaborating with agency and industry partners to develop a comprehensive policy framework for regulatory harmonization, which will streamline oversight and strengthen cybersecurity readiness and resilience across critical infrastructure sectors.

A summary report on the RFI revealed concerns about the lack of harmonization and reciprocity across federal agencies that could harm cybersecurity outcomes and the problem extends to businesses of all sectors and sizes.

“Partners raised concerns not only about a lack of harmonization and reciprocity across Federal agencies, but also between state and Federal regulators and across international borders,” Coker said.

POC - 2024 Cyber Summit

Join the Potomac Officers Club’s 2024 Cyber Summit on June 6 to hear from government and industry experts about the dynamic and ever-evolving role of cyber in the public sector. Register here!

Cybersecurity/News
ECS’ Mark Maglin, Patrick Elder: Army Endpoint Security Solution Uses Data Mesh for Data Protection, Network Visibility
by Jane Edwards
Published on June 5, 2024
ECS’ Mark Maglin, Patrick Elder: Army Endpoint Security Solution Uses Data Mesh for Data Protection, Network Visibility

Mark Maglin and Patrick Elder of ECS said the Army Endpoint Security Solution or AESS uses data mesh architecture to help the military branch protect its data, produce cyberthreat intelligence and achieve network visibility to safeguard and defend more than 800,000 endpoints across the service branch’s global infrastructure.

In an article published on the company’s website, Maglin and Elder noted that ECS has been overseeing AESS as a managed zero trust security service for Army Cyber Command since 2016.

To mature AESS, the ECS executives highlighted the need to implement a data catalog, which builds a machine-readable inventory of data products within an organization using metadata.

“Having a robust data catalog, where data has been curated and normalized to semantic standards, will empower individual users to independently develop useful data analytics,” they wrote.

According to Elder and Maglin, the AESS platform uses data mesh to help cyber operators achieve data-driven decision advantage.

“AESS enables decision dominance by producing, collecting, and analyzing threat data to improve enterprise visibility and effectively protect the Army’s mission networks,” they noted.

Maglin is vice president of Department of Defense cybersecurity at ECS and Elder is director of ECS Data and AI Center of Excellence.

POC - 2024 Cyber Summit

Maglin will participate in the Potomac Officers Club’s 2024 Cyber Summit on June 6. Register here to listen to cyber experts and government and industry leaders as they discuss zero trust, supply chain security, cyber resilience and more.

Government Technology/News
NASA Eyes Solicitation for Capability Studies on Lunar Surface User Terminals, Network Orchestration & Management Tech
by Jane Edwards
Published on June 5, 2024
NASA Eyes Solicitation for Capability Studies on Lunar Surface User Terminals, Network Orchestration & Management Tech

NASA plans to invite industry stakeholders to conduct capability studies in the areas of lunar surface user terminals and network orchestration and management systems through a solicitation under the Next Space Technologies for Exploration Partnerships-2, or NextSTEP-2 broad agency announcement.

For the first study area, NASA is seeking industry studies on user terminals that could meet requirements to support moon exploration plans and ensure interoperability with developed standards, according to a presolicitation notice published Tuesday on SAM.gov.

Under the second study area, the space agency is interested in industry-led studies and demonstrations on systems that could help control and interface with a distributed network of satellite ground systems supporting the Near Space Network.

“The resulting studies will ensure advancement of NASA’s development of space communication and exploration technologies, capabilities, and concepts,” the notice reads.

NASA’s Commercialization, Innovation and Synergies Office will outline the detailed study requirements, participant eligibility, submission information, evaluation criteria and other information on the overall acquisition strategy in the forthcoming Appendix Q solicitation.

Through NextSTEP-2, the agency intends to facilitate industry studies to provide space mission users with a resilient infrastructure for space and ground communications and infrastructure.

Artificial Intelligence/DoD/News
CDAO Seeks Industry Partner for AI Governance Mechanism Assessment & Implementation
by Jerry Petersen
Published on June 5, 2024
CDAO Seeks Industry Partner for AI Governance Mechanism Assessment & Implementation

The Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office’s Responsible Artificial Intelligence division seeks an industry partner that would help it map existing Department of Defense AI governance mechanisms, identify areas that require new governance mechanisms and develop a roadmap to guide DOD components in implementing them.

According to an open call posted Wednesday on Tradewinds AI, the industry partner would work to analyze the DOD’s existing AI governance mechanisms or those that might be applicable to it, develop the means to be used by CDAO in offering DOD components recommendations regarding AI governance processes and help implement those recommendations.

The open call may result in pilot project awards to be issued via the other transaction authority for prototype projects.

Interested parties have until June 17 to respond.

Previous 1 … 265 266 267 268 269 … 2,603 Next
News Briefing
I'm Interested In:
Recent Posts
  • NIST Issues Updated Security & Privacy Control Catalog
  • Air Force Announces Collaborative Combat Aircraft Program Milestone
  • DCSA to Begin DISS Cloud Migration Under IT Modernization Strategy
  • NSA, Other Agencies Release Advisory Against China-Sponsored Cyberthreats
About

ExecutiveGov, published by Executive Mosaic, is a site dedicated to the news and headlines in the federal government. ExecutiveGov serves as a news source for the hot topics and issues facing federal government departments and agencies such as Gov 2.0, cybersecurity policy, health IT, green IT and national security. We also aim to spotlight various federal government employees and interview key government executives whose impact resonates beyond their agency.

Read More >>

RSS ExecutiveBiz
  • DOD, Peraton & Okta Launch myAuth Authentication System
  • NATO Procurement Agency Gets State Department Approval for $104M AIM-9X Sidewinder Missile FMS
  • Seekr Adds Allison Binns & Mat Winter to Advisory Board
  • Anthropic Launches National Security & Public Sector Advisory Council
  • VA Continues Rollout of New Acquisition Management System Powered by CGI’s Momentum
  • SNC Demos Airlift/Tanker Open Mission Systems Capabilities During Air Force Exercise
RSS GovConWire
  • Applied Signals Intelligence Appoints Azhar Haq as VP, CFO
  • Jilee Rich Joins Trilogy Federal as Vice President of Growth
  • Accenture Announces NeuraFlash Acquisition to Boost AI Capabilities
  • DHS Announce Plans for Potential $100M Counter-UAS Acquisition
  • Google to Invest Another $9B in Virginia’s Cloud, AI Infrastructure
  • DLA Launches Market Survey for $3.2B C5ISR G2S Contract’s Open Season
Footer Logo

Copyright © 2025
Executive Mosaic
All Rights Reserved

  • Executive Mosaic
  • GovCon Wire
  • ExecutiveBiz
  • GovCon Exec Magazine
  • POC
  • Home
  • Acquisition & Procurement
  • Agencies
    • DoD
    • Intelligence
    • DHS
    • Civilian
    • Space
  • Cybersecurity
  • Technology
  • Executives
    • Profiles
    • Announcements
    • Awards
  • News
  • Articles
  • About
  • Wash100
  • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Submit your news
    • Jobs
Go toTop