In what’s being described as the most significant procurement reform in over 40 years, the federal government has launched the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul Initiative, aimed squarely at improving speed, clarity and competition in the acquisition process. For government contractors, this means a more streamlined Federal Acquisition Regulation, new compliance expectations and a shift toward market-based practices.
Driven by Executive Order 14275, titled Restoring Common Sense to Federal Procurement, the initiative is being executed by the Office of Federal Procurement Policy in coordination with the FAR Council, GSA, the Defense Department and NASA. According to Wiley Rein, the effort centers on simplifying the FAR by eliminating duplicative, outdated or non-statutory rules and placing greater trust in acquisition professionals’ judgment.
Table of Contents
How Was the FAR Overhaul Implemented?
The overhaul is being implemented using a two-track approach. First, agencies are expected to adopt model class deviations—simplified, pre-approved versions of updated FAR parts—within 30 days of their release. Second, formal rulemaking will follow based on feedback gathered during this interim phase, according to the Defense Acquisition University.
For contractors, this means that new rules are taking effect now, even as the official FAR language is still being finalized. That creates a moving target for compliance, particularly in high-volume sectors like IT modernization, defense systems and infrastructure.
Recent updates cover FAR Parts 1, 10, 11, 18, 34, 39, 43 and 52—areas critical to GovCon operations. FAR Part 1 now includes a sunset clause: any provision not mandated by statute will expire after four years unless renewed by the FAR Council. According to Cohen Seglias, that creates significant long-term flexibility but demands heightened awareness in the near term.
What Is the Goal of the FAR Overhaul?
A major goal of the overhaul is reducing complexity to make it easier for new vendors to compete for federal work. The new rules rely more on commercial best practices, plain language and flexible guidance rather than rigid mandates. For example, the revised FAR Part 11 removes prescriptive language around brand-name justification and instead encourages use of market research.
While this benefits competition, especially for emerging tech providers and small businesses, it also puts more onus on vendors to understand and apply procurement best practices without as much top-down instruction. To support this transition, the government is rolling out nonbinding “buying guides,” practical resources that accompany the new rules but exist outside the regulatory framework. These are part of a new Strategic Acquisition Guidance model.
Overhaul’s Impact for Defense and National Security Contractors
For defense contractors, the implications are particularly critical. Revisions to FAR Part 34 remove some of the procedural hurdles around Earned Value Management Systems and major system acquisition, opening the door for greater agility but also shifting some risk onto contractors.
The changes also come at a time when the Defense Department is doubling down on agile procurement, commercial technology integration and joint all-domain operations. GovCons operating at the tactical edge or in rapid innovation cycles may find the new FAR structure aligns more closely with their delivery models—but only if they stay ahead of the evolving rules.
How Should GovCons Respond to the FAR Changes?
Contractors should take the following steps to stay competitive and compliant:
Monitor model deviation text posted to Acquisition.gov and ensure internal contracting teams and compliance officers are reviewing each update.
Engage with the process by submitting feedback on revisions and participating in ongoing industry discussions. Informal comments during the deviation phase will help shape final rulemaking.
Leverage DAU’s Practitioner Albums, which offer continuing education credit and explain the practical application of each new deviation. This is especially helpful for primes with large proposal and capture teams.
Update internal policies and training, as many longstanding acquisition procedures may no longer apply.
Josh Gruenbaum, Federal Acquisition Service commissioner and 2025 Wash100 winner, underscored the administration’s aim during a recent GSA-hosted webinar: “We’re not just looking to clean up the FAR—we’re trying to give agencies and vendors the space to operate in a more agile and mission-driven way.”
FAR Overhaul Next Steps
FAR revisions are being released in rolling waves, and more parts are expected to follow before the end of the year. Agencies are required to implement model deviations within 30 days, with a full target date for initial implementation set for Oct. 13.
That pace leaves little room for delay. For GovCons, proactive adaptation will separate the companies that thrive in the new acquisition landscape from those that fall behind.
Related Articles
The Senate Appropriations Committee on Thursday voted 26-3 to pass a bill that would appropriate $851.9 billion in discretionary defense funding for fiscal year 2026. Weapons Systems Procurement The committee said Thursday the proposed FY 2026 Defense Appropriations Act would allocate $171.3 billion for weapon systems procurement and $140.5 billion for platform research, development and testing. The measure includes a $280 million increase in funding for F-135 spare engines and an additional $500 million for F-35 sustainment spare parts; an additional $216 million for drone and counter-drone tech capabilities; $4.6 billion more for air and missile defense efforts; and a
NASA wants to team up with industry to develop advanced space technologies for future commercial or government use. The space agency on Wednesday issued an announcement of collaboration opportunity, or ACO, to solicit partnership proposals. Managed by the Space Technology Mission Directorate, the ACO gives industry partners access to NASA subject matter expertise, facilities, software and hardware to accelerate and enhance capability development. According to NASA, the ACO will be open for five years and will serve as an umbrella opportunity for topic-specific appendices that would be released every six to 12 months to address evolving needs. For the 2025
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., head of the Department of Health and Human Services, and other government and healthcare technology leaders have committed to delivering a patient-centric digital health ecosystem. At an event hosted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services at the White House, over 60 companies pledged to collaborate and deliver results that benefit the public in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, 11 health systems and providers said they will support patient use. Seven electronic health record companies pledged to facilitate data exchange. According to Kennedy, bureaucrats and entrenched interests have made health data inaccessible to patients,