By Ryan McCullough, executive vice president and chief strategy officer at ShorePoint
Federal agencies are under increasing pressure to modernize securely and cost-effectively while rationalizing tool portfolios, integrating emerging technologies and ensuring compliance with evolving mandates. Whether modernizing a security operations center, evaluating AI-based analytics platforms or selecting a new SIEM tool, government tech leaders face a daunting challenge: how to choose the right solution for their mission and technical environment with confidence.
That’s where VANTAGE comes in. Developed by ShorePoint, the structured Analysis of Alternatives, or AoA, framework provides agencies with a clear, data-driven view of best-fit technical solutions for their mission-specific requirements.
Table of Contents
What Is VANTAGE?
VANTAGE, or Verification and ANalysis of Technological Alternatives for Government Enterprises, is a repeatable, structured decision-support framework. Incorporating agency- and program-specific needs, VANTAGE delivers quantifiable decision support data and risk-informed recommendations based on prioritized business, technical and regulatory factors.
At its core, VANTAGE is about helping federal leaders make better cybersecurity tech decisions, faster.
How It Works: Creating a Unique Vantage Point
Each engagement begins by identifying a complete set of stakeholders — decision-makers, operators and beneficiaries. Together, they step through the VANTAGE process:
1. Stakeholder alignment: Through a series of workshops and a templated data collection process, ShorePoint captures a holistic understanding of the agency’s operational, business, technical, financial, functional and security requirements.
2. Requirement integration: These stakeholder inputs are then aligned with relevant regulatory and mandated requirements to identify overlaps, conflicts and critical considerations.
3. Prioritization: Using a numerical weighting process, ShorePoint prioritizes the requirements, helping agencies clearly distinguish ‘must have’ from ‘nice to have’ capabilities.
4. Market analysis: With the prioritized framework in place, ShorePoint conducts an open-source market scan to identify a competitive range of candidate solutions.
5. Lab-based validation: Top-scoring solutions are evaluated in ShorePoint’s Commercial Cloud Lab Environment—dubbed CCLE—a secure AWS-based lab, where the team builds prototypes and test plans to validate and evaluate each solution’s efficacy in meeting the requirements.
6. Quantitative evaluation: Each solution is assessed and scored based on technical performance, interoperability with existing technologies, cost, regulatory alignment, implementation complexity and deployment flexibility (on-prem, hybrid or cloud-native). Distinct benefits, risks, and fit with requirements, goals, and constraints are also considered for each deployment model.
The result? Objective analysis and scoring of each option, mapped to the agency’s unique priorities. In follow-on workshops, decision-makers receive a clear picture of options and trade-offs, enabling confident choices based on real-world constraints and mission goals.
When and Why Agencies Use VANTAGE
Agencies typically engage ShorePoint’s VANTAGE process as part of larger cybersecurity architecture or engineering efforts. One of the biggest hurdles? Gaining clarity on what the agency actually needs.
VANTAGE helps federal teams not only articulate their goals but also prioritize them, develop well-structured requirements and evaluate technology based on real-world performance, not just claims. Whether evaluating SOC modernization, deploying data pipelines or meshes, or exploring AI-enabled security tools, VANTAGE gives agencies a structured way to articulate their needs and agree on desired outcomes — and find the right solution.
A Different Approach, Built for Federal Complexity
While some federal contractors rely on prebuilt test plans or manufacturer-recommended criteria, VANTAGE considers each agency’s mission and operating requirements. The process itself is tool- and deployment-agnostic, so every evaluation aligns with the customer’s specific goals and constraints, first. (Not the tools’ features.)
That tailored approach — along with a focus on transparency, stakeholder input and quantifiable scoring — has made VANTAGE a trusted part of ShorePoint’s work with cybersecurity leaders across the government.
And the impact is measurable. Customers use VANTAGE to:
- Build stronger business cases for cybersecurity technology investments
- Reduce acquisition risk
- Align technical capabilities with mission outcomes
- Maximize the value of modernization efforts
- Validate emerging tools and platforms, including AI
Staying Ahead of Change
To keep pace with fast-evolving technologies and regulations, ShorePoint combines hands-on lab testing with deep engagement in the federal cybersecurity ecosystem.
In addition to CCLE’s continuous development and training capabilities, ShorePoint’s team actively participates in advisory councils, technical forums and professional associations. The company’s technical leaders also contribute to and lead communities of practice. For example, the head of ShorePoint’s high-performance computing line of business leads the HPC Security Technical Exchange, a consortium that brings together more than 100 practitioners from across industries and government organizations to explore new approaches to cybersecurity at scale.
This combination of technical experimentation, real-world feedback loops and industry thought leadership ensures VANTAGE reflects the latest innovations, tools and regulatory requirements — helping federal customers move forward with confidence.
Enabling Smarter Cyber Decisions
As federal agencies face an increasingly complex technology market and heightened scrutiny to justify IT and cybersecurity investments, VANTAGE offers a repeatable, rigorous method to support sound decisions. It helps agencies define priorities, evaluate options, and make the right choice based on quantitative data.
ShorePoint has refined VANTAGE over more than seven years of federal cybersecurity work. The framework delivers a unique vantage point that helps government leaders see clearly, decide confidently and act decisively.
Related Articles
The White House on Thursday tapped Jim O’Neill, deputy secretary at the Department of Health and Human Services, to serve as acting director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, The Washington Post reported. Hear experts discuss the latest tech advancements, policies and more at the Potomac Officers Club’s 2025 Healthcare Summit on Dec. 4. Save your spot now for this GovCon networking event! O’Neill’s appointment came days after Susan Monarez’s dismissal as head of the CDC over federal vaccine policy. According to people familiar with the matter, O’Neill will continue to serve as deputy to HHS Secretary Robert F.
Oliver Wise announced on LinkedIn Friday that he has stepped down as acting under secretary for economic affairs and chief data officer of the Department of Commerce. He officially departed the department on Aug. 30. “I leave with deep gratitude and immense respect for the public servants across Commerce and the federal government who devote their careers to the national interest,” said Wise. Oliver Wise’s Career Highlights Wise served in the department for over three years, overseeing the strategic direction of the Census Bureau and Bureau of Economic Analysis as the acting under secretary for economic affairs. As CDO, he spearheaded
Leonel Garciga, the U.S. Army’s chief information officer and a two-time Wash100 awardee, has signed a memorandum providing guidance for the service branch to ensure that artificial intelligence products used within the Army comply with records management, or RM, privacy protections and the Freedom of Information Act, or FOIA. The Aug. 26 memo was posted on the Army Publishing Directorate’s website. The document requires application and system owners to capture, sustain and manage records generated through AI tools and low-code/no-code platforms. They must ensure that all user interactions, including prompts and AI-generated content, are properly identified, retained and secured as