The U.S. Navy plans to add Virginia Payload Module missile tubes to its existing and future Virginia-class submarines to give the ships the ability to deploy new missiles and unmanned undersea vehicles, USNI News reported Wednesday. 

Rear Adm. John Tammen, director of undersea warfare on the chief of naval operations’ staff, said the service is developing a next-generation land-attack weapon that would replace the Tomahawk land-attack missile as one of the principal weapons on the submarines.  
The new missile will also support the future Block VI and VII Virginia-class submarines and the SSN(X) ship of the Navy. 

George Drakeley, the Navy’s program executive office for submarines executive director, said the plan comes amid the “great power competition” with Russia and China.

“We need to be focusing on other potential capabilities,” he added.

The Government Accountability Office has called on eight federal departments and their component agencies to organize their policies and review and approval processes for their information technology budgets. 

The GAO said in a report published Tuesday that despite meeting the Office of Management and Budget’s requirements for establishing a method for implementing the Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act, the departments of Energy, Health and Human Services, Justice and Treasury lack practices for ensuring that their chief information officers are properly managing and reporting their IT budgets.

The aforementioned agencies have no clear way of verifying if their CIOs checked their IT portfolio, which should include appropriate estimates of all IT resources included in their budget request.

The four organizations also did not state in their FITARA implementation and delegation plans how they would execute OMB’s requirements.

The GAO noted that the absence of a standard approach for addressing IT budgeting requirements could create inconsistent practices for facilitating the oversight of CIOs on IT budgets.

The agency advised the four departments to demonstrate their implementation of OMB requirements and develop ways of ensuring that their IT budgets are informed by reliable cost information.

Other agencies that the GAO mentioned in its report include the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, FBI, Internal Revenue Service and National Nuclear Security Administration.

Researchers at the Department of Homeland Security have built a new tool that offers faster assessment of soil conditions around bridge pillars after hurricanes and heavy rains that may affect bridge stability. 

The DHS said Tuesday that its Science and Technology Directorate developed the Soil Probe with the Coastal Hazards Center of Excellence. The tool mainly analyzes the erosion of soil around a structure caused by water flow.

Soil Probe eliminates the need to take samples for laboratory testing, which traditional assessment requires to check soil resistance to erosion. The device also has minimal dependence on power because of its rechargeable batteries and requires only two personnel to operate. 

“This device can be used in places where taking samples is not feasible,” said Mohammed Gabr, a professor at North Carolina State University and developer of Soil Probe.

The DHS said transportation and bridge engineers, contractors as well as the Federal Emergency Management Agency can use the instrument in future field assessments. 

“The testing is rapid — it can go 30 feet deep within five minutes — and can be done in many places along a bridge for a complete mapping of the bridge foundation support area,” Gabr added. 

A new report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office shows that the Defense Department is failing to properly guide contracting officials in awarding contracts through the lowest price technically acceptable process.

GAO said Tuesday some DOD officials admitted they were confused about how to apply two of the eight criteria for using the LPTA process.Â

Four of the 14 contracting officials interviewed by the agency said they did not understand how to apply the criteria to see if “the goods being purchased are predominantly expendable in nature, nontechnical or have a short life expectancy or shelf life” and if the lowest price “reflects full life-cycle costs, including for operations and support.”

“Absent clarification on how to consider these two criteria, DOD increases the risk that its contracting officials will not consistently implement the requirements” in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017, the GAO said.Â

The agency estimates that 26 percent of contracts and orders valued $5M and above in fiscal year 2017 from DOD were released using the LPTA process.Â

The Pentagon agreed with the GAO’s recommendations to revise its regulations and issue a new guidance by end of fiscal year 2019 on how contracting officials should apply the two criteria.

Jake Wooley, Department of Energy information technology program manager, has said the modified guidance on the Data Center Optimization Initiative seeks to simplify some reporting requirements around the program, Federal News Network reported Tuesday.

Wooley explained at a MeriTalk-hosted event that the updated guide aims to streamline a few of the reporting methods that the Office of Management and Budget established for both DCOI and the Federal Data Center Consolidation Initiative.

The draft guidance will also lay out the characteristics of a tiered data center, as well as direct agencies to update their data center inventories annually instead of quarterly.

Wooley noted that OMB is expected to coordinate with agencies to set requirements according to their missions needs and closure and consolidation goals, with some regard to cost savings.

OMB Cloud Strategy Leader Bill Hunt will be head authority for the implementation of the new DCOI instructions. 

“I believe this new guidance will reflect much of the feedback and input that OMB has received from the agencies as we look to move forward in the new DCOI,” he added.

The Defense Department‘s inspector general has determined that the DoD failed to fully carry out the mandate of a 2015 statute designed to enhance the cybersecurity posture of government and private organizations.

The Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015 called on seven federal agencies, including the DoD, to develop policies that would facilitate the sharing of classified and unclassified cybersecurity threat indicators and defense measures among government as well as private entities, the DoD IG stated in a recently-released audit report.

The DoD IG observed that CISA was enacted inconsistently across the DoD, noting that “none of the four DoD Components reviewed” — namely the National Security Agency, the DoD Cyber Crime Center, the Defense Information Systems Agency and U.S. Cyber Command — “implemented all of the CISA requirements.”

The inspector general attributed this deficiency to the failure of the Defense Department’s chief information officer to promulgate an agency-wide CISA implementation and compliance directive.

The DoD IG went on to push for the formulation of such a directive since the fragmentary implementation of CISA prevents the DoD from gaining “a more complete understanding of increasing and persistent cybersecurity threats by leveraging the collective knowledge and capabilities of sharing entities.”