//
GSA Holds Industry Webinar on FAR Overhaul Initiative
Published on
GSA is holding an industry webinar for an overhaul initiative for FAR and FAS Commissioner Josh Gruenbaum shared his thoughts

The General Services Administration has hosted a webinar to inform over 5,500 stakeholders about an initiative to amend the Federal Acquisition Regulation in line with executive orders impacting government procurement, namely EO 14275 and EO 14240.

The FAR overhaul, the most significant update in 40 years, aims to consolidate contracting, streamline federal procurement, eliminate unnecessary regulations and enhance value for taxpayers, GSA said Wednesday. 

The agency, which the Office of Management and Budget designated as the executive agent for all governmentwide acquisition contracts, will work with OMB’s Office of Federal Procurement Policy to simplify the acquisition process and reduce administrative burdens that hinder companies from doing business with the government. 

“This initiative of simplicity directly complements our newly rolled out OneGov strategy which will enable the government to act with one federal wallet in an efficient manner, leveraging our buying power to get better prices for agencies and better value for taxpayers,” said Federal Acquisition Service Commissioner Josh Gruenbaum, a 2025 Wash100 awardee. 

Executive Order 14240

EO 14240, titled “Eliminating Waste and Saving Taxpayer Dollars by Consolidating Procurement,” requires the consolidation of purchases of common goods and services under GSA, including all GWACs for information technology, to avoid contract duplication and redundancy and enable other agencies to focus on their core missions. 

Executive Order 14275

EO 14275, titled “Restoring Common Sense to Federal Procurement,” requires the rewriting of FAR to remove unnecessary regulations and focus on efficient, secure and cost-effective procurement processes.

///
DIA Issues Draft RFP for Contract Operations for Missile Evaluation and Testing
Published on
DIA wants proposals for its missile T&E contract.

The Defense Intelligence Agency’s Missile and Space Intelligence Center, through the Virginia Contracting Activity, has issued a draft request for proposals for Contract Operations for Missile Evaluation and Testing, or COMET, during July 2025.

According to the pre-solicitation notice posted on SAM.gov Wednesday, MSIC plans to procure research, development and sustainment services for new and existing hardware, systems and software capabilities. These services will also support foundational military intelligence, or FMI, to facilitate all-source analysis and production for DIA, the Department of Defense and national intelligence operations.

DIA Issues Draft RFP for Contract Operations for Missile Evaluation and Testing

In addition, MSIC intends to acquire analysis and analytical enabling services support for the Defense Intelligence Enterprise and its mission partners.

Get valuable insights from intelligence community leaders on emerging threats, geopolitical shifts and the role of intelligence in safeguarding the nation. Register to join the Potomac Officers Club’s 2025 Intel Summit on October 2.

COMET Contract Details

The potential indefinite-delivery-indefinite-quantity, multiple award contract will have a five-year base ordering period and a five-year option period. Additional task orders may have a one-year base period and up to four option periods. Funds will be obligated upon issuance of each task order.

Interested parties can submit their responses until June 25.

//
Post-Quantum Cryptography Coalition Publishes Guidance for PQC Migration
Published on
MITRE and PQC coalition members published a roadmap for PQC migration. Wen Masters, an exec at MITRE, encouraged its adoption

The Post-Quantum Cryptography Coalition, or PQCC, a community of leading cybersecurity organizations such as MITRE, has published a guide for transitioning to quantum-safe cryptography. 

The Post-Quantum Cryptography, or PQC, Migration Roadmap empowers chief information and chief information security officers to more proactively protect data against current and future threats, said Wen Masters, vice president of cyber technologies at MITRE. 

“As quantum computing technology continues to advance, organizations cannot afford to delay preparing for these transformative changes and threats to their security,” the official commented. 

PQC Adoption Framework

The document is divided into four categories: preparation, baseline understanding, planning and execution, and monitoring and evaluation. 

The preparation category provides information about assessing an organization’s vulnerabilities, identifying goals and setting up a timeline for migration. Although the technology needed to crack traditional cryptography is not yet available, adversaries may harvest sensitive information from a target organization now and then decrypt later on. The type of data an organization protects, therefore, dictates the urgency of adopting PQC. 

The coalition also advises organizations to assign a leader to oversee migration and to create an inventory of electronic assets as part of their preparation for PQC. 

The second category focuses on ensuring that the organization has a baseline understanding of its data inventory and assets and the available resources to support migration. These factors, according to the document, will enable organizations to prioritize assets to be updated and determine future activities. 

At this point, organizations are advised to begin exploring cryptographic algorithms for each asset. 

For category three, or planning and execution, organizations must decide which PQC solutions should be acquired commercially or developed internally. PQCC also said organizations must create short-term measures to ensure that sensitive systems and information are protected from ‘harvest now, decrypt later’ attacks. 

The final category, monitoring and evaluation, involves tracking the organization’s migration process and establishing a way to assess cryptographic security in response to the evolving quantum landscape. 

The Post-Quantum Cryptography Coalition also includes Microsoft, IBM Quantum, PQShield, SandboxAQ and the University of Waterloo.

///
Stephen Purdy Puts Big Space Force Primes On Notice
Published on
Maj. Gen. Stephen Purdy is considering cheaper commerical alternatives to expensive legacy space programs.

Maj. Gen. Stephen Purdy wants commercial providers to infuse cutting-edge space technologies into legacy, big-budget U.S. space systems.

Purdy, the Space Force’s top acquisition official, recently signed an acquisition decision memorandum, or ADM, directing an analysis of commercial options for procuring new space situational awareness capabilities to monitor geosynchronous orbit, according to Breaking Defense. This means Purdy’s command is looking over expensive legacy programs to find out if there are commercial alternatives for performing their missions.

“We basically had our team look for the last couple of weeks at many of our programs, looking for anything that looks like it could use some commercial competition. And so it’s a whole host of them,” said Purdy, who is formally the military deputy to the assistant secretary of the Air Force for space acquisition and integration.

Learn more about these new space business opportunities during Purdy’s keynote address at the Potomac Officers Club’s 2025 Air and Space Summit on July 31! Find out which other programs will be targeted for commercial competition. Stick around for Space Force Vice Chief of Space Operations Gen. Michael Guetlein’s closing keynote. Boost your bottom line. Sign up today!

Deep Space Advanced Radar Capability

Space Systems Command is starting this initiative with a review of the Deep Space Advanced Radar Capability for commercial options. DARC is a partnership between the U.S., United Kingdom and Australia to track very small objects in geosynchronous orbit to protect critical U.S. and allied satellite services. 

Northrop Grumman has been developing DARC for the Department of Defense. The Government Accountability Office in April 2023 said DARC had $1.4 billion in actual and planned funding through 2027.

But Purdy’s not stopping with DARC. Other ADMs are in development on programs including satellite communications and ground systems with some requests for information possibly forthcoming.

What Is GSSAP?

Purdy has been busy implementing his goal for tapping commercial space companies. He signed a new acquisition memorandum in April to replace the Geosynchronous Space Situational Awareness Program, a.k.a. GSSAP, constellation with commercial options, according to Space News.

GSSAP is a system of custom-developed satellites created solely for military use. GSSAP satellites collect space situational awareness data, allowing for more accurate tracking and characterization of human-made orbiting objects. GSSAP satellites perform rendezvous and proximity operations, which allow a space vehicle to maneuver near a space object of interest while maintaining flight safety. Northrop Grumman is also developing GSSAP.

Under this commercial infusion effort, Space Force will have multiple commercial companies build, launch and operate surveillance satellites for the Pentagon. This new initiative will be unclassified and available to U.S. allies via DOD’s foreign military sales program.

SCN Under Review

Purdy is also considering competition for the Satellite Control Network, a global network of ground stations and communications infrastructure that entered operations in 1959. Space Force is fielding new antennas for the SCN because it is concerned that it would not perform as expected during warfare.

The SCN is a network of 19 antennas around the world that communicate with, and control, U.S. government spacecraft, including defense and intelligence satellites. But the SCN is aging and difficult to maintain. The GAO found in 2023 that the SCN was facing sustainment and obsolescence issues while demands on the system were growing.

Dig into other paradigm-shifting space technologies at the 2025 Air and Space Summit on July 31! Attend a fascinating discussion on whether technology can outpace emerging threats in the new space race. Find out about industry partnerships at the optical data relay to modernize space communications panel. Make new connections with other GovCon leaders and rekindle existing ones. Tickets are selling fast, don’t miss out!

Stephen Purdy Puts Big Space Force Primes On Notice
/
Executive Order Seeks to Restore ‘Gold Standard Science’
Published on
President Trump seeks to spur innovation by restoring agency use of "gold standard science."

President Donald Trump has signed an executive order that seeks to restore agency use of “gold standard science” to spur innovation and ensure that federally funded research is impactful, transparent and rigorous.

The White House said Friday the EO directs the director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy to work with agency heads to release guidance for implementing gold standard science in managing their scientific activities.

The policy defines gold standard science as science conducted in a way that is reproducible; transparent; communicative of error and uncertainty; collaborative and interdisciplinary; skeptical of its findings and assumptions; structured for falsifiability of hypotheses; subject to unbiased peer review; accepting of negative results as positive outcomes; and without conflicts of interest.

Upon the guidance’s release, agency heads should update their agency policies governing the production and use of scientific information to implement the guidance. They should also report their implementation progress to the OSTP director within 60 days.

Enhancing Scientific Data Use & Communication

The EO requires agency heads and employees to publicly share data, analyses, models and conclusions related to scientific and technological information generated or used by the agency no later than 30 days following the policy’s issuance.

Employees should acknowledge and document uncertainties when using scientific data in agency decision-making. They should also be transparent about the likelihood of the assumptions used and implement a “weight of scientific evidence” approach when scientific or technological data is used to inform agency assessments and decision-making.

The policy directs agency employees to communicate scientific data in accordance with the results of the relevant analysis and evaluation. It also states that communications involving a scientific model or information derived from a scientific model should include reference to any material assumptions that inform the outputs of the model.

Reinstating Scientific Integrity Policies

The order claims to reinstate the scientific integrity policies of the first Trump administration.

When updating such policies in accordance with the EO, agencies should ensure that they encourage the open exchange of ideas, allow for consideration of dissenting or different viewpoints and protect employees from efforts to prevent or deter consideration of alternative scientific opinions.

/
Navy’s David Isom Named Senior Enlisted Adviser to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
Published on
Navy Fleet Master Chief David Isom has been appointed the next senior enlisted adviser to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs.

U.S. Navy Fleet Master Chief David Isom has been chosen as the next senior enlisted adviser to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

The Department of Defense said Tuesday the appointment was announced by the Office of the SEAC, or OSEAC. Isom will succeed Troy Black, who has served as SEAC since November 2023.

Who Is David Isom?

Isom was assigned to the position of command senior enlisted leader of the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command on June 30, 2022. Before that, he was the command senior enlisted leader of the Special Operations Command Pacific and the Special Operations Command North. Isom also served as command master chief of the Naval Special Warfare Group TEN and the Special Reconnaissance Team TWO.

Furthermore, Isom was assigned to the Naval Special Warfare Development Group, Joint Special Operations Command, Tactical Development and Evaluation Squadron ONE and SEAL Team ONE.

The Navy leader was part of Sea, Air, Land, or SEAL, Teams at the Theater Special Operations Commands and the joint environment. He served several tours of duty during his career, including Operation Desert Shield, Operation Desert Storm, Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom,. He was also deployed in the Pacific and the Horn of Africa.

Earlier in his career, Isom was assigned to the USS Mount Hood and the USS Mauna Kea. He joined the Navy in 1987 and completed basic training at the Recruit Training Command in Great Lakes, Illinois.

//
Army Officially Names Future Tactical Assault Aircraft MV-75
Published on
The Bell V-280 Valor tiltrotor aircraft in flight

The U.S. Army has officially designated its Future Long Range Assault Aircraft, or FLRAA, as MV-75.

The service branch said Tuesday MV is short for multimission vertical takeoff and 75 stands for the Army’s founding year, 1775.

The initial aircraft prototype will be designated “YMV-75A.”

“The Army is committed to delivering the Future Long Range Assault Aircraft. It will provide the speed, range and endurance needed to conduct air assault, MEDEVAC and resupply missions for future large-scale combat operations,” said Brig. Gen. David Phillips, program executive officer for aviation. “We’re all looking forward to seeing the incredible impact the MV-75 will have on the Soldiers of tomorrow.”

Army Officially Names Future Tactical Assault Aircraft MV-75

Learn more about the service’s latest contracting opportunities and hear experts discuss modernization imperatives, force structure optimization and more at the Potomac Officers Club’s 2025 Army Summit on June 18.

Future Long Range Assault Aircraft Program

Launched in 2019, the FLRAA program is part of the Army’s Future Vertical Lift modernization portfolio and seeks to replace a portion of the current fleet of tactical assault and utility aircraft for the Army and U.S. Special Operations Command.

FLRAA will provide special operations aviation units and combat aviation brigades with a long-range, high-speed aircraft platform designed to operate in contested environments. It is designed to complement the Army’s fleet of UH-60 Black Hawk helicopters. The aircraft’s standoff capability and extended reach will improve tactical maneuvering over strategic and operational distances.

In December 2022, Textron’s Bell subsidiary won a potential $1.3 billion contract from the Army to build its V-280 Valor tiltrotor for the FLRAA program.

The program seeks to integrate a modular operation systems approach into the design, procurement and sustainment of the aircraft to speed up the deployment of threat-driven capabilities while fostering mission system commonality and affordability throughout the aircraft’s lifecycle.

//
DARPA Issues RFI for Venture Horizons Initiative
Published on
DARPA's Venture Horizons initiative aims to connect investors with its R&D efforts.

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency has issued a notice soliciting feedback from the investment community on its Venture Horizons initiative.

According to the request for information posted on SAM.gov May 12, DARPA seeks to connect investors with DARPA program managers, research and development performers and other subject matter experts through the new initiative.

What Is Venture Horizons?

Venture Horizons is an initiative designed to bridge the gap between top-tier investors and DARPA’s advanced R&D efforts. It aims to boost the effects of the agency’s technological advancements by enabling investors to access DARPA’s portfolio and subject matter experts to create investment opportunities, paving the way for impactful results.

These investment prospects reinforce the strategic partnerships between DARPA and the investment community, facilitating the development, expansion and deployment of technologies funded by the agency for the Department of Defense, commercial or dual-purpose markets.

The RFI intends to gather responses addressing four key areas. First, it highlights investment goals, including an investment entity’s capacity to invest, performance record and willingness to self-certify that it is free from adversarial capital or partners. Second, the notice focuses on history and domain expertise, particularly in technology categories aligned with the six DARPA technical offices. The third key area is commitment of service, emphasizing a commitment to supporting the agency’s national and economic security objectives. Finally, the RFI seeks unique capabilities relevant to DARPA, including staff with current security clearances, geographical sector preferences or restrictions and hands-on performance.

/
NSA Teams With Int’l Cyber Agencies to Craft Guidance for Implementing SIEM, SOAR Platforms
Published on
NSA worked with Australia and other countries to create new cybersecurity guidance for implementing SIEM and SOAR tools.

The National Security Agency has partnered with the Australian Signals Directorate’s Australian Cyber Security Centre, also known as ACSC, and other international organizations to provide guidance for implementing SIEM, which is short for Security Information and Event Management, and SOAR, or Security Orchestration, Automation and Response. 

New documents published Tuesday aim to define, identify potential challenges and share recommendations for implementing SIEM and SOAR tools. 

What Are SIEM & SOAR?

SIEM and SOAR enable an organization to gain better visibility of its network. According to NSA, SIEM collects, aggregates and correlates log data to monitor cyber activity and identify threats. Meanwhile, SOAR analyzes data to automatically send out alerts as soon as it detects malicious cyber activity,  accelerating mitigation and response.

SIEM and SOAR work hand-in-hand to secure networks and more rapidly detect cyber incidents. 

The first document, titled Implementing SIEM and SOAR platforms: Executive guidance, said that adopting SIEM and SOAR as part of an organization’s cybersecurity strategy requires ongoing human intervention. Cyber personnel must ensure that they are applying the appropriate types, quantities, rules and filters for data ingested by the SIEM tool. 

Meanwhile, the Implementing SIEM and SOAR platforms: Practitioner guidance reminds network defenders to carefully configure SOAR platforms based on their organization’s unique environment. Cyber professionals must determine which cyber incident responses must be automated and how these actions may affect products and services. Without properly configuring SOAR’s automated response, the cyber tool may misidentify regular user or system behavior, take automatic measures and disrupt service delivery. 

Both publications also discuss different aspects of adopting SIEM and SOAR platforms, such as costs, use cases and best practices.

A third guidance, called Priority Logs for SIEM Ingestion: Practitioner Guidance, offers detailed recommendations of data logs that SIEM platforms must ingest to improve performance. 

/
DHS S&T’s Brian Henz Discusses Explainability, Other Challenges of GenAI
Published on
DHS science adviser Brian Henz has thoughts on the challenges of artificial intelligence applicability.

Brian Henz, a senior science adviser on artificial intelligence for the Department of Homeland Security’s Science and Technology Directorate, identified explainability as a major challenge in applying generative AI. 

The technology expert recently participated in a roundtable discussion with other leaders to exchange perspectives on the applicability of generative AI. He provided a summary of the discussion in a blog post on DHS.gov. 

Why AI Explainability Is Critical

Explainability, according to Henz, is especially crucial to AI used in public services, where impacts on an individual will be significant. It enables decision-makers to determine where the AI model made a mistake and ensure that similar incidents in the future can be mitigated. 

However, the official pointed out that neural networks are “black boxes.” It is difficult to identify the data that led to a certain decision. 

“If Gen AI is applied, by the nature of how it learns and generates new data, it can be difficult to track where things went wrong,” he wrote in the blog post. 

AI: Other Challenges

During the roundtable discussion, Henz and other speakers identified more challenges and areas of consideration when using the technology. For instance, generative AI tools are designed for individual use cases and may not be repurposed for another application without system adjustments. 

Repurposing code can also create new risks and vulnerabilities, the official noted. 

DHS is exploring the use of AI to aid in various agency missions. The agency recently piloted three AI tools that can conduct interviews with refugees and asylum seekers, summarize law enforcement reports and create hazard mitigation plans. According to Henz, the pilots have provided DHS decision-makers with insights on the real-life impact of generative AI tools.

1 … 98 99 100 101 102 … 2,656