/
Docusign to Grant Discounts to Government Clients Under GAO’s OneGov Strategy
Published on
Josh Gruenbaum. General Services Administration secures government discounts on Docusign services; Gruenbaum comments.

Electronic signature technology provider Docusign will offer discounts to federal customers through an agreement under the General Services Administration’s cost-cutting OneGov Strategy.

A discount of 70 percent will be available for Docusign eSignature plans and 50 percent discount for Intelligent Agreement Management, or IAM, plans up to Jan. 31, 2027, GAO said Thursday.

Cloud-Based DocuSign Tools

The cloud-based Docusign eSignature enables users to sign and manage documents electronically, including contracts and agreements. The company’s IAM cloud software platform is designed to help customers originate and organize their agreements from creation to file administration. The tools support organizations’ technological infrastructure on procurement to help speed up vendor onboarding and improve vendor management.

Federal Acquisition Service Commissioner Josh Gruenbaum, a 2025 Wash100 Award winner, conveyed GSA’s appreciation on Docusign’s collaboration in providing federal workforce tools streamlining government processes. “GSA’s OneGov is driving efficiency in operations and delivering significant savings for taxpayers,” Gruenbaum commented.

Allan Thygesen, Docusign’s CEO, noted that given that the company’s eSignature product is FedRAMP-authorized and Impact Level 4-certified, it can help streamline critical processes and deliver faster results with greater efficiency and security.

In another recent OneGov initiative, the GSA awarded Uber in July a five-year blanket purchase agreement to provide ridesharing services for federal employees, military personnel and government contractors supporting mission-related activities worldwide. The BPA will help the federal government reduce travel costs, the agency said.

/
Navigating New Federal Acquisition Regulations: What GovCons Need to Know
Published on
The sweeping procurement reform of the FAR Overhaul brings many things GovCons need to understand and implement.

In what’s being described as the most significant procurement reform in over 40 years, the federal government has launched the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul Initiative, aimed squarely at improving speed, clarity and competition in the acquisition process. For government contractors, this means a more streamlined Federal Acquisition Regulation, new compliance expectations and a shift toward market-based practices.

Driven by Executive Order 14275, titled Restoring Common Sense to Federal Procurement, the initiative is being executed by the Office of Federal Procurement Policy in coordination with the FAR Council, GSA, the Defense Department and NASA. According to Wiley Rein, the effort centers on simplifying the FAR by eliminating duplicative, outdated or non-statutory rules and placing greater trust in acquisition professionals’ judgment.

How Was the FAR Overhaul Implemented?

The overhaul is being implemented using a two-track approach. First, agencies are expected to adopt model class deviations—simplified, pre-approved versions of updated FAR parts—within 30 days of their release. Second, formal rulemaking will follow based on feedback gathered during this interim phase, according to the Defense Acquisition University.

For contractors, this means that new rules are taking effect now, even as the official FAR language is still being finalized. That creates a moving target for compliance, particularly in high-volume sectors like IT modernization, defense systems and infrastructure.

Recent updates cover FAR Parts 1, 10, 11, 18, 34, 39, 43 and 52—areas critical to GovCon operations. FAR Part 1 now includes a sunset clause: any provision not mandated by statute will expire after four years unless renewed by the FAR Council. According to Cohen Seglias, that creates significant long-term flexibility but demands heightened awareness in the near term.

What Is the Goal of the FAR Overhaul?

A major goal of the overhaul is reducing complexity to make it easier for new vendors to compete for federal work. The new rules rely more on commercial best practices, plain language and flexible guidance rather than rigid mandates. For example, the revised FAR Part 11 removes prescriptive language around brand-name justification and instead encourages use of market research.

While this benefits competition, especially for emerging tech providers and small businesses, it also puts more onus on vendors to understand and apply procurement best practices without as much top-down instruction. To support this transition, the government is rolling out nonbinding “buying guides,” practical resources that accompany the new rules but exist outside the regulatory framework. These are part of a new Strategic Acquisition Guidance model.

Overhaul’s Impact for Defense and National Security Contractors

For defense contractors, the implications are particularly critical. Revisions to FAR Part 34 remove some of the procedural hurdles around Earned Value Management Systems and major system acquisition, opening the door for greater agility but also shifting some risk onto contractors.

The changes also come at a time when the Defense Department is doubling down on agile procurement, commercial technology integration and joint all-domain operations. GovCons operating at the tactical edge or in rapid innovation cycles may find the new FAR structure aligns more closely with their delivery models—but only if they stay ahead of the evolving rules.

How Should GovCons Respond to the FAR Changes?

Contractors should take the following steps to stay competitive and compliant:

Monitor model deviation text posted to Acquisition.gov and ensure internal contracting teams and compliance officers are reviewing each update.

Engage with the process by submitting feedback on revisions and participating in ongoing industry discussions. Informal comments during the deviation phase will help shape final rulemaking.

Leverage DAU’s Practitioner Albums, which offer continuing education credit and explain the practical application of each new deviation. This is especially helpful for primes with large proposal and capture teams.

Update internal policies and training, as many longstanding acquisition procedures may no longer apply.

Josh Gruenbaum, Federal Acquisition Service commissioner and 2025 Wash100 winner, underscored the administration’s aim during a recent GSA-hosted webinar: “We’re not just looking to clean up the FAR—we’re trying to give agencies and vendors the space to operate in a more agile and mission-driven way.”

FAR Overhaul Next Steps

FAR revisions are being released in rolling waves, and more parts are expected to follow before the end of the year. Agencies are required to implement model deviations within 30 days, with a full target date for initial implementation set for Oct. 13.

That pace leaves little room for delay. For GovCons, proactive adaptation will separate the companies that thrive in the new acquisition landscape from those that fall behind.

/
DOD IG Reports Inefficiencies in Handling of Continuing Resolutions for Acquisition Programs
Published on
Department of Defense logo. The DOD's internal watchdog issued the results of its new audit

A new report found that the Department of Defense is not effectively managing acquisition programs operating under continuing resolutions. In the Audit of the Impact of Continuing Resolutions on DOD Acquisition Programs, published Thursday, the department’s Office of Inspector General, or OIG, the Pentagon did not track or adequately communicate the impact of CRs on acquisition programs.

DOD OIG’s Report Findings

One of the issues the OIG found is the lack of guidance for requests to exempt programs from CR. In fiscal 2024, military services submitted a total of 87 acquisition-related anomaly requests, but only one was approved by Congress.

Officials also reported a lack of clarity on whether programs undergoing administrative change would be considered a new start. The OIG said the problem stemmed from the Pentagon not communicating how the new start constraint could apply to existing programs.

Moreover, the DOD’s budget execution reviews did not take into account delayed or limited funding under CRs.

As a result, CRs led to program delays, which could affect national security and defense. Officials also shared that CRs created additional administrative burdens and cost inefficiencies.

As a result, CRs led to program delays, which could have a negative effecy on national security and defense. Officials also shared that CRs created additional administrative burdens and cost inefficiencies.

“Because the DOD did not track the impact of CRs, the impact on national security, the Defense Industrial Base, and program costs and schedules across the DoD is unknown,” commented Brett Mansfield, deputy inspector general for audit at the Pentagon. “Better processes for tracking the actual impacts will help the DoD to communicate to Congress the consequences of CRs on DOD acquisition programs.”

How DOD Can Improve

The OIG made several recommendations to the under secretary of defense (comptroller) and the department’s chief financial officer.

One recommendation is to develop a method to track the impacts of CRs on acquisition programs. The OIG also advised the DOD to establish parameters for anomaly requests.

/
Senate Confirms Joseph Kent as National Counterterrorism Center Director
Published on
Joe Kent. Kent has been confirmed by the Senate as the next director of NCTC.

The Senate on Wednesday voted 52-44 to confirm Joseph Kent as the new director of the National Counterterrorism Center, after President Donald Trump nominated him in February. In his role, Kent will be managing the agency established to collect and analyze intelligence aimed at preventing acts of terrorism and overseeing a workforce of over 1,000 personnel, according to the Washington State Standard. He will also report to Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.

Senate Confirms Joseph Kent as National Counterterrorism Center Director

Join the Potomac Officers Club 2025 Intel Summit on October 2 to learn about the rise of new threats, technological advancements and geopolitical shifts in the intelligence community and listen to insights from top leaders. 

Who Is Joseph Kent?

Kent is a Republican candidate who lost his seat in the U.S. House of Representatives in southwest Washington twice to Democrat Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, both last November and in 2022.

He is also a project manager for a technology start-up and a security consultant and sole proprietor at Perpetual. In 2018, he became an operations officer of the intelligence community. Before that, he was a troop commander at the U.S. Army Special Operations Command. He served in the Army’s 5th Special Forces Group for nearly a decade as a detachment commander, intelligence sergeant and weapons sergeant. He began his career as a soldier in the Army’s 75th Ranger Regiment. 

//
Navy Unveils Software Containerization Policy
Published on
DON CIO Jane Rathbun. Rathbun signed a memo establishing a software policy on containerization tech usage.

The Department of the Navy has issued a memorandum establishing a software containerization policy to boost operational agility and drive resiliency and optimization of DON investments.

Jane Rathbun, DON’s chief information officer and a two-time Wash100 awardee, signed the Containerization Technology Usage memo with Brett Seidle, acting assistant secretary of the Navy for research, development and acquisition.

Navy Unveils Software Containerization Policy

Rathbun will be one of the keynote speakers at the Potomac Officers Club’s 2025 Navy Summit on Aug. 26. Save your spot now to hear her and other experts discuss the latest tech advancements, policies and more at this event.

In a LinkedIn post published Wednesday, the Office of the DON CIO said the document applies to all new software development and modernization initiatives operating in cloud environments with enterprise container platforms or DevSecOps pipelines.

Transforming DON’s IT Infrastructure Through Software Containerization

According to the memo, software containerization could help transform DON’s software deployment and IT infrastructure by enabling it to deploy applications across highly varied environments while accelerating development cycles, improving security and reducing computing resource overhead.

Prioritizing containerization tech usage supports DON’s mission-critical operations and aligns with its software modernization goals.

Exceptions to Software Containerization Policy

The memo states that potential exceptions to the policy may include alternative cloud scaling capabilities, production representative digital twins or virtualization technologies for hardware in the loop. 

All requests for exceptions must include a detailed justification that addresses tech limitations, mission impacts, cost and cybersecurity risk assessment, and should be submitted to the designated cybersecurity technical authority.

//
NIST Seeks Feedback on Draft Secure Software Development Guidelines
Published on
Software development. NIST is seeking feedback on draft software development security guidelines.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology is conducting a public consultation on a preliminary draft of guidelines for improved security in all stages of the software development lifecycle, from a software’s initial planning and testing to its deployment, operation and maintenance.

A NIST consortium, including National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence computer security experts and 14 industry partners, created the draft NIST Special Publication 1800-44, titled Secure Software Development, Security, and Operations Practices, in accordance with Executive Order 14306, which aims to strengthen U.S. cybersecurity, NIST said Wednesday. The agency plans to hold a virtual event on Aug. 27 to discuss the guidelines and gather additional insight for the project ahead of the Sept. 12 deadline for feedback on the draft.

SP 1800-44 Expands NIST’s Secure Software Development Framework

The publication will complement the best practices outlined in NIST’s Secure Software Development Framework, or SSDF. According to the agency, the SSDF provides high-level secure software development practices but does not guide organizations in creating a secure development environment that fits their objectives. Building on the SSDF, SP 1800-44 offers specific examples to help organizations establish such an environment, accelerate software development and keep unauthorized individuals from the development processes.

“The SSDF looks at building software holistically, helping organizations figure out what needs to be done to make their development environment more secure, how to protect it and find deficiencies that make it vulnerable,” said NCCoE’s Alper Kerman, one of the publication’s authors. “The draft guidelines we are developing will show how organizations can use commercial, off-the-shelf technologies and AI capabilities and apply zero trust principles and methodologies to create an efficient and secure development environment for producing fast and more reliable software.”

/
OSTP Director Discusses American AI Export Stack, Safety Institute Rebranding
Published on
OSTP Director Michael Kratsios. Kratsios discusses the White House's AI Action Plan

Governments around the world are exploring the use of artificial intelligence to manage data and provide public services, and it would create risks if nations start using AI solutions that are not from the United States, warned Michael Kratsios, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and a two-time Wash100 awardee.

During a recent event, the official recalled his experience convincing nations to remove telecommunications equipment made by the Chinese technology company Huawei.

“Whether it’s the way you pay your taxes, whether it’s your health care records, whether it’s small things like if you want to get a permit to go to national park for a campsite – all of this stuff is going to be part of the AI fabric,” he explained during the event. “And it would be a huge problem if the model that is fine-tuned to generate these AI solutions isn’t from America.”

America’s AI Stack for Export

Kratsios’ comments follow the White House’s issuance of an AI Action Plan, which tasked the Department of Commerce to team up with industry to develop full-stack AI export packages. Offering a technology stack for export instead of individual tools could make adoption easier for foreign governments.

The official also pointed out that, while a lot of countries want to implement AI, the specifics of how they use the technology remain unclear. He shared that the U.S. can “fill in the blanks” for foreign government partners.

“We have to show them what the potential is for AI for their people, and their country and their economies, and make it as easy as humanly possible for them to implement it,” Kratsios said.

NIST’s Center for AI Standards and Innovation

Kratsios also addressed the recent rebranding of the AI Safety Institute, which was established under the previous administration, to the Center for AI Standards and Innovation. The OSTP director explained that the AI Safety Institute was too focused on setting up guardrails, curtailing innovation.

The new center, he revealed, will conduct model measurements and evaluations.

The Center for AI Standards and Innovation will operate under the National Institute of Standards and Technology. It will figure out how to measure a model, which would be invaluable to industry. 

/
DAF PEO C3BM Highlights New Strategic Anchors to Enhance Battle Network
Published on
C3BM PEO Luke Cropsey. The DAF PEO C3BM unveiled three new strategic anchors to strengthen the DAF BATTLE NETWORK.

The Department of the Air Force Program Executive Office for Command, Control, Communications and Battle Management has unveiled new strategic priorities aimed at enhancing the decision-making capabilities and resilience of joint and coalition forces.

PEO C3BM’s 3 New Strategic Anchors

The DAF PEO C3BM shared Wednesday that Maj. Gen. Luke Cropsey, C3BM PEO and 2025 Wash100Award winner, highlighted three new strategic anchors to strengthen the DAF Battle Network. He emphasized that the first anchor is to utilize a “deliver to depreciate” approach, prioritizing rapid capability deployment to address operational gaps and build stronger credibility and responsiveness with operational partners.

The second is to develop a comprehensive technical strategy for the entire DAF Battle Network by identifying technologies vital to mission needs. The PEO aims to unify the technical foundation of the DAF Battle Network, or “The Stack,” to accelerate the adoption of innovations. Cropsey asserted that to close mission threads, the PEO must actively manage key technologies by identifying weapons platforms, developing components and communications for each kill chain, then aligning schedules and budgets to deliver on the advertised capabilities.

The third anchor ensures that supporting activities are aligned with the implementation of the other two strategies. This includes accelerating delivery processes by eliminating bureaucratic obstacles. Cropsey further stressed the importance of operating faster than adversaries, particularly in procurement, requirements and resource enterprises.

“Our goal is to define a clear list of priorities by program, align our manpower with those priorities, engage with our key stakeholders and codify our plan and the resulting resource decisions to deliver capabilities to our warfighters now,” said Cropsey.

//
SBA Issues Letter of Warning to Federal Contracting Officers Following Reports of Fraud
Published on
SBA Administrator Kelly Loeffler. Loeffler published a letter of warning for government contracting officers

The Small Business Administration has issued a formal letter of warning reminding government contracting officers to report suspected fraud, waste and abuse. According to SBA Administrator Kelly Loeffler, the notice represents the agency’s commitment to strengthening its oversight of the SBA 8(a) Business Development Program.

“Our 8(a) contracting officers have a legal responsibility to uphold the law and protect taxpayer dollars, ensuring that federal awards go to legitimate, eligible small businesses,” the official said. “Today, we’re putting them on notice – that we will no longer tolerate the self-dealing and fraud that was allowed to proliferate under the Biden Administration.”

The 8(a) program provides training and technical assistance to socially and economically disadvantaged small business owners. It also opens up opportunities for small businesses to work with government agencies and enter the federal marketplace.

DOJ Uncovers SBA Fraud

The letter follows a Department of Justice investigation of the 8(a) Business Development Program that revealed fraud and bribery schemes involving federal contracts. According to the investigation, over $550 million in federal contracts were fraudulently awarded by a contracting officer from the U.S. Agency for International Development. One federal contractor involved in the scheme received $800 million in contracts, even after it was flagged by USAID for its lack of “honesty or integrity.”

Loeffler has already ordered a full-scale audit of the business development program. The audit will look at high-dollar and limited-competition contracts issued in the past fifteen years.

“Effective immediately, I am launching a full-scale audit of the program to stop bad actors from making the kind of backroom deals that have already cost taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars,” the official said at the time. “We must hold both contracting officers and 8(a) participants accountable – and start rewarding merit instead of those who game the system.”

//
CISA Unveils Zero Trust Microsegmentation Guidance Part 1
Published on
CISA official Shelly Hartsook cited the release of new guidance for agencies to implement microsegmentation as part of ZTA.

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency has issued the first part of its latest guide that provides an overview of microsegmentation as part of CISA’s efforts to help federal civilian executive branch agencies implement zero trust architectures.

CISA Unveils Zero Trust Microsegmentation Guidance Part 1

Join the Potomac Officers Club’s 2025 Homeland Security Summit on Nov. 12, and keep abreast of the latest government cybersecurity initiatives and policies. Save your spot now!

What Is the Purpose of CISA’s Zero Trust Microsegmentation Guidance?

CISA said Tuesday the document titled “Microsegmentation in Zero Trust, Part One: Introduction and Planning” is part of its Journey to Zero Trust series and covers key concepts associated with microsegmentation, which seeks to reduce the attack surface, limit lateral movement and boost visibility.

“So many organizations, both on the federal side and in the private sector, we saw make early investments in zero trust network access tools, or SASE tools – secure access service edge –as part of their early implementation,” Shelly Hartsook, an acting associate director within CISA’s cybersecurity division, told Federal News Network in an interview.

“And there is a value in those bringing those tools into the toolbox and initially implementing them. This guidance can help organizations make the most of those technology investments and how they’re configured and really used across the enterprise,” Hartsook added.

The document also offers recommended actions to advance zero trust principles and modernize network security.

The agency intends to launch a subsequent technical guide to provide implementatation teams with technical considerations and detailed implementation scenarios.

Phased Approach to Microsegmentation

The document provides agencies with a phased approach when transitioning portions of their enterprise to microsegmentation.

The phased approach includes identifying candidate resources for segmentation; identifying dependencies for selected candidate resources; determining appropriate segmentation policies; and deploying updated segmentation policies.

Hartsook noted that implementing microsegmentation requires organizations to do careful planning from the start.

“So really understanding how to apply it and having a deliberate strategy architecture and planning is critical to doing this in a way that achieves the cybersecurity intent without mucking up your just normal business with your organization,” she told FNN.

1 2 3 4 5 … 2,591